International regulator seeks to increase investor protection in case of investment fund termination

IOSCO consults on good practices for the termination of investment funds in an effort to increase investor protection

The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) today published a consultation report on Good Practices for the Termination of Investment Funds, which proposes a set of good practices on the voluntary termination process for investment funds.

IOSCO recognises the importance for investment funds to have termination procedures in place from an investor protection perspective. The decision to terminate an investment fund can have a significant impact on investors in terms of cost or their ability to redeem their holdings in a timely manner during the termination process. Both retail and professional investors can be affected by the ultimate value of their investment in a fund at the time of termination. The report targets a broad range of investment funds including collective investment schemes (CIS) and other fund structures such as commodity, real estate and hedge funds.

Most regulatory regimes have certain criteria for the termination of investment funds in their jurisdiction, ranging from the over arching obligation to act in the best interests of investors, to prescriptive requirements for liquidating the portfolio and the payment of final distribution proceeds.

But legislation at a national level in most jurisdictions addresses involuntary terminations (for example, in the case of insolvency of an investment fund).
IOSCO’s work focuses on voluntary terminations with the objective to develop a set of good practices for the termination of investment funds which take into account investor interests during this process.

Voluntary terminations typically occur because an investment fund, although still solvent, is no longer economically viable or can no longer serve its intended objectives. The decision to terminate in these cases is taken by the responsible entity, although this decision may be based on factors outside its direct control.

In a number of jurisdictions, an investment fund may elect not to terminate by liquidating its assets and repaying investors, and instead will seek to merge its assets with another investment fund, often managed by the same responsible entity. In this regard, IOSCO is considering whether the issues arising from investment fund mergers generally would have a particular impact on the termination process.

IOSCO is consulting on 15 good practices for the termination of investment funds that are categorised under the following headings:

  • Disclosure at Time of Investment
  • Decision to Terminate
  • Decision to Merge
  • During the Termination Process
  • Specific Types of Investment Funds

Public comments on this consultation paper should be submitted on or before 17 October 2016.

The IOSCO statement and related information is available here.

Lavanya Rathnam

Lavanya Rathnam is an experienced technology, finance, and compliance writer. She combines her keen understanding of regulatory frameworks and industry best practices with exemplary writing skills to communicate complex concepts of Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) in clear and accessible language. Lavanya specializes in creating informative and engaging content that educates and empowers readers to make informed decisions. She also works with different companies in the Web 3.0, blockchain, fintech, and EV industries to assess their products’ compliance with evolving regulations and standards.

Posted in UncategorizedTagged ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *